Nasa Contractors List

Wednesday`s hearing was notable because it appears to mark an escalation in an intense lobbying battle that took place behind the scenes by some contractors — most likely led by Boeing — instead of killing NASA`s proposed lunar gateway and accelerating funding for upper-stage exploration. I hope that if such a list exists, it will be a dynamic list that will be updated over time as contracts are concluded, proposed and won. Any help in obtaining such information would be greatly appreciated. Below is a list of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration`s (NASA) Top 100 Prime Contractors in fiscal 2020, ranked by total contract funds awarded. The data was provided by the U.S. government. In fiscal 2020, NASA awarded contracts totaling $18.90 billion, up 4.1 percent from fiscal 2019 from $18.16 billion. NASA`s share of total government contracts was 2.8% in FY20, up from 3.1% in FY19). In fiscal 2020, the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) received $2.81 billion in master contracts, or 14.9 percent of the total contract funds awarded by NASA. Boeing came in second with $1.49 billion (7.9%), followed by Lockheed Martin in third place with $1.40 billion (7.4%). Northrop Grumman ranks fourth with $1.36 billion (7.2%), followed by Jacobs Engineering Group with $1.04 billion (5.5%), Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX), KBR, Science Applications International (SAIC), Gencorp and Arctic Slope.

If I know contracts come and go over time, where can I find a list of current companies that have contracts with NASA to do research or build things for them? My goal is to get a general idea of who does what in the space industry, and I think looking at the contracts awarded by NASA is a good way to find a piece of the puzzle. I`m looking not only for a list of specific contractors, but also a description of what each contractor does for NASA. California Institute of Technology The Boeing Company Lockheed Martin Corp. Northrop Grumman Corp. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. KBR Inc. Science Applications International Corp. Gencorp Inc. Arctic Slope Regional Corp. Sierra Nevada Corp. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

United Launch Alliance L.L.C. Science Systems and Applications Inc. Johns Hopkins University Blue Origin Federation LLC Raytheon Technologies Corp. Association of Univ. for Research in Astronomy Dynetics Inc. Leidos Holdings Inc. Syncom Space Services LLC Space Systems/Loral LLC ATA Aerospace LLC Millennium Engineering and Integration Services Ball Corp. General Dynamics Corp. Astrobotic Technology Inc. Southwest Research Institute Inc. Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc. Universitäten Space Research Association Trax International Corp.

PAE-SGT Partners LLC Les régents de l’Université du Colorado Teledyne Technologies Inc. Wyle Laboratories Inc. AECOM Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. Alcyon Technical Services (Ats) Jv LLC The Aerospace Corp. Manufacturing Technical Solutions Inc. Barrios Technology Ltd. Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten Mori Associates Inc. ADNET Systems Inc. Université de l’Oklahoma Computer Sciences Corp. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.

SGT LLC Bastion Technologies Inc. Russie Space AGency Pontchartrain Partners LLC Aerie Aerospace LLC AI Solutions Inc. HX5 LLC Axiom Space LLC Business Integra Technology Solutions Inc. Université de l’Arizona All Points Logistics Inc. HX5 Sierra LLC Jacobs Technology Inc. Colsa Corp. Calista Corp. Chenega Corp. Kajima Corp. Trident Vantage Systems LLC Venesco & Saitech Joint Venture Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LP Bechtel National Inc. Intuitive Machines Inc.

CACI International Inc. Honeybee Robotics Ltd. New Horizons Aeronautics LLC Hergestellt in Space Inc. Peerless Technologies Corp. Air Products and Chemicals Inc. ZIN Technologies Inc. OPR LLC The University of Iowa LJT & Associates Inc. State of California General Atomics Masten Space Systems Inc. Amentum Services Inc.

Logical Innovations Inc. NANA Regional Corp. American-Paragon Protective Services LLC Afognak Native Corp. European Space Research and Techn. Centre General Electric Company ARES Holding Corp. Techtrans International Inc. Alutiiq Fusion Joint Venture Metis Flight Research Associate LLC Inuteq LLC Victory Solutions Inc. Honeywell International Inc. Healtheon Inc. Advon Corp. PTSI Subsidiary I Company Science and Technology Corp. According to these plans, human crews would launch on NASA`s Space Launch System rocket, which would propel the Orion spacecraft and its crew to a lunar gateway to the Moon.

Prior to this manned mission in late 2024, commercial rockets were launching elements of this gateway, as well as components of the lander that would bring humans from the gateway to the lunar surface. NASA is also concerned that there are not enough SLS rockets to be built by 2024 to support the Artemis program, so the agency wants to support its manifesto with reusable private rockets. $2,814 $1,485 $1,398 $1,360 $1,038 $848 $529 $528 $436 $359 $345 $278 $276 $273 $257 $230 $212 $207 $203 $198 $197 $151 $142 $136 $128 $106 $105 $102 $94 $86 $82 $80 $94 $94 $6 82 $80 $136 $128 $106 $105 $102 $94 $86 $82 $80 $13677 $76 $71 $70 $67 $66 $65 $62 $61 $57 $57 $57 $56 $55 $52 $51 $50 $47 $46 $45 $43 $43 $42 $39 $37 $37 $37 $37 $36 $35 $34 $34 $34 $34 $33 $32 $32 $32 $32 $31 $30 $29 $29 $29 $28 $28 $28 $28 $27 $25 $24 $23 $23 $21 $21 $21 $21 $20 $20 $20 $19 $18 $17 $17 $17 $17 $17 $17 It was not at all surprising that Mo Brooks, a representative from Alabama, which supports Boeing and the SLS rocket, which was developed in its state at the Marshall Space Flight Center – Cooke`s argument argued. He read Cooke`s comment at Wednesday`s hearing. In recent weeks, however, there has been resistance from the traditional aerospace industry. Publicly, it began with a comment in The Hill by Doug Cooke, a former NASA administrator who oversaw the design and early development of the SLS rocket. In his paper, Cooke argued that the fastest and safest way for NASA to land humans on the moon is to ignore commercial launchers, bypass the gateway, and accelerate the development of the upper stage of exploration. LIST OF NASA aircraft – Throughout its history, NASA has deployed several types of aircraft on a permanent, semi-permanent or short-term basis. These aircraft are usually surplus, but in some cases they are newly built military aircraft. Content 1 NASA 515 2 F5D.

. Wikipedia In its efforts to land humans on the Moon by 2024, NASA has opted for a “mixed fleet approach” to build systems in lunar orbit over the next five years. At a house space subcommittee hearing Wednesday, outlines of a battle over the future of NASA`s Artemis lunar program surfaced. Still, it wasn`t a partisan battle over whether the White House`s Republican plan to land humans on the moon by 2024 should take place. Instead, some members of both political parties wondered how the space agency would implement the Artemis program. “It`s not just the center stage, it`s the boosters and the engines,” Cooke said. “NASA is currently the integrator. If you want to arrive at a fixed price for a launcher, it seems to me better to combine that into a main contract where the owner of the main contract has control of all the processes and can bring some of these efficiency gains. It has not been said that Boeing, which manages the central stage and the upper exploration stage, would be this “prime contractor”. At this point, there is no way that Artemis 3`s upper exploration stage will be ready in 2024,” the NASA administration source told Ars.


Scroll to top